Tags
Caucasian appearance, Cronulla Riot, Derryn Hinch, High Court, Middle Eastern appearance, NSW Police Force, Pacific Islander appearance, Richard Ackland, Serious Sex Offenders Monitoring Act, South-West Sydney, SWPL, Sydney Morning Herald, The Daily Telegraph, The Shire, White people
Derryn Hinch, who is a famous in Australia Radio broadcaster, yesterday in the High Court lost his battle to be able to “name and shame” serious pedophiles and rapists “subject to extended supervision orders after they had served their sentences.” In Victoria pedophiles and rapists can have their names suppressed “under the Serious Sex Offenders Monitoring Act…” Breaches of this act “…carry maximum penalties of $60,000 in fines and up to five years in jail” as Richard Ackland reports.
Ackland notes of this act that “…it is a curious piece of legislation because its scheme allows for the protection of serious sex offenders, those with a stronger chance of reoffending, and not the less serious criminals in this category of crime.” Isn’t that bizarre. In Victoria you can “name and shame” minor criminals, serious criminals, any criminals excepting those who are serious sex offenders, against adults and children, and who are the subject of suppression orders. Ackland states that:
The court said yesterday the requirement that justice be administered openly was not an absolute rule and that suppression orders were not repugnant to the “institutional integrity of the judiciary”. The courts are required to take notice of the “public interest” when deciding to suppress part of the proceedings, but as we know there’s a lot of flexibility in that concept.
As to the implied freedom-of-political speech the judges accepted that the legislation did “burden” freedom of communication about government or political matters. However, there was a competing interest, namely the “protection of the community by the effective monitoring of released sex offenders”.
In what way is the community protected by keeping serious sex offenders who live among them anonymous? Surely this is placing a higher premium on the value of the life and freedom of the rapist and or pedophile than that of the normal, law abiding citizen. And in what way is it in the community’s interests to have court proceedings kept secret from them? There is no wide and broad community interest being served at all here. What is being served is the interests of a small community of violent sexual predators over and above the wider community. That is the inescapable conclusion.
In relation to this suppression we have the ongoing suppression of facts with regard immigrant crime, not only in the MSM but also in NSW Police reports, as I have been detailing in the last few days. Today the Sydney Morning Herald (SMH) reports the matter of a robbery of a taxi driver and states:
Anyone with information about the two men, who both had English or Irish accents, should phone Crime Stoppers on 1800 333 000.
A clear identification of the race of the attackers is imparted to the public. The public’s interest has been served well here by the SMH. Yet, this clear identification of the race of perpetrators when it comes to “of Middle Eastern appearance” is almost always removed from the rephrasing of NSW Police reports in that very same newspaper. Why? It is surely in the public’s interest to know the race of the attackers simply so that they may assist in the identification and capture of alleged criminals. But the SMH obviously must have some policy that requires its reporters to remove racial descriptors only when the alleged are of Middle Eastern appearance.
But there is a more profound problem than the deliberate and biased censoring of race in the SMH. The NSW Police Force’s media reports never disclose race when arrests have been made. Or if arrests are in progress. Not naming arrested persons is in the interests of justice, and therefore in the community’s interests however, not describing the race of the arrested parties is not in the community’s interest. The community has a need to know the particulars of these crimes so that the community is able to assess what is going on its own community.
For example: today 11/03/2011 the NSW Police Force released a media report titled “Man charged over Toongabbie brawl”. The “brawl” had occurred on Wednesday 09/03/2011 when:
…police were called to Toongabbie Road in Toongabbie, after a group of up to 20 males attended the repair shop armed with bats, bars, knuckle dusters and a large machete-style knife.
The group assaulted about 10 employees. One of them sustained deep lacerations to both legs, while others suffered broken noses, bruising and cuts.
Wowee, “what’s going on here?” the normal law abiding citizens asks. “What is happening to my community?” “Who are these people?” Well, the NSW Police Force won’t let you know. They didn’t give any racial details when it occurred and they were asking for the public’s assistance, and they won’t give us those details now. Why not? It is obviously in our interest to capture these men, so much so the NSW Police Force “appeal for public assistance following brawl – Girraween”. Yet, apparently the NSW Police Force find that it is not in our interest to have any particular information as to what race or nationality these brawlers are. Naturally the Daily Telegraph and Sydney Morning Herald are unable to provide those details either since crime reporting seems to be pretty much a copy and paste job on the part of those journalists. One certainly gets the impression that the old style of investigative journalism is well and truly dead.In a rarity though, it does appear that someone attended the scene and snapped a photo of Police investigations in progress.
Is someone afraid that vigilantes might take it upon themselves to administer rough justice should they know that the brawlers are, probably given the photo, of Pacific Islander appearance? I wouldn’t have thought so since the brawlers allegedly carry “bats, bars, knuckle dusters and a large machete-style knife.” Mate, I don’t think anyone’s going to mess with these lads.
Now here’s a really funny thing, one I’m sure will give you big laffs for sure. I know I did. On Wednesday 08/03/2011 the SMH ran a story titled “Key players in Shire ‘ice’ syndicate arrested, claim police”. Now we locals know all about “the Shire”. It’s the home of the ridiculously over rated “Cronulla riot” which is also and only attributed to being a solely “white riot” against Muslim Lebanese. So famous is the Shire and its “riot” that it even now has a Wikipedia entry in its honour. So how does the SMH graphically depict this “Shire ‘ice’ syndicate” bust you ask? Why with a picture of a White man’s hands in handcuffs of course!
Sorry about the size of the pictures.
Funny ain’t it! The Shire is full of White people, the sort of White people the SMH hates. So naturally they use a stock photo of a White man in handcuffs to indicate the race of the criminals involved. But get this, even funnier fun fact, race was never mentioned in any of the NSW Police reports. One of the arrested is in fact “a 35-year-old Beverley Hills man” which, again the locals know, is not a White suburb. It’s an area dominated by that racial/ethnic group the SMH refuses to mention. What is quite clear is that the SMH doesn’t cater to the broad and wide Australian community. It caters to it’s own community: minority groups who the SWPL leftists at the SMH use to sow division into the White community. The SMH, contrary to their earnest pleas for love and compassion and better angels and talking about your soul actually despises and hates you – you the White person who loves his nation.
And people don’t believe in conspiracies.